BE A PROTESTANT IS LIKE

> Openly gay Clergy and pastors


> inclusive with Faggots and Heathenry . And sides with Pagans and Infidels instead


> hates the Catholic Church which Jesus Founded upon Peter the Rock.


>Muh KJV & SOLA SCRIPTURA only😂


> hates Mother Mary just like the Demons do.... instead of venerating her as All Apostolic Christians do


> Literally follows a Mixture of Ancient Heresies on a New Level


> Seethes when they Realize that they are No Longer Part of One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. 😁



> Proudly Twists Scripture and Bible Verses to support his/her Agenda by quoting Out of Context bible verses



> Vehemently Hates the Body and Blood of Christ that is spoken about in Matthew 26:26–28 , Mark 14:22–24 , Luke 22:19–20 , John 6:51-58 , AND ALSO 1 Corinthians 11:23–25 ....



> Vile Person who Mocks the Body and Blood of Christ by Partaking of Supermarket bought Grape Juice and sandwich Bread😂😂



>>constant Cribbing and using Ad Hom fallacies when their lies FAIL.

Hello brothers, please pray for my friend, Kyle. He lives in Oregon, WA, in the United States.

He is considering becoming Catholic and is on the fence.

He attends church regularly but is worried about what his wife will think.

I think he will become a great witness to the faith. She is a devout Christian devoted to make her children become Christian too.

May we pray they both align their faith and become a Catholic family. In Jesus name, Amen.

We'll... In case you want us to deal with a Particular issue or want us to Respond to Your Questions .

Feel free to Question us

Update on Sister Chiara Agnes (MC).

she battles for her life in a hospital located in the Amazon in the country of Brazil. Please Pray for her to be Healed and Saved🙏

Really Awesome Rock Music Cover... I know its totally Unrelated .... buti thought it'd be Cool to Share ❤️☝️

Reason to Doubt Islam: The Aorta Prophecy and the Satanic Verses

Islam teaches that the Qur’an is the perfect, unaltered word of God and that Muhammad was the final and infallible messenger. But when you examine some of the details in the Islamic sources themselves, serious contradictions and red flags begin to emerge.

1. The Aorta Prophecy – Qur’an 69:44–46

“And if Muhammad had made up some false sayings about Us,
We would have seized him by the right hand,
Then We would have cut his aorta.”
(Qur’an 69:44–46)

This verse makes it clear: if Muhammad had invented any part of the message, Allah would kill him by severing his aorta. That was the divine test.

Now, fast forward to the end of Muhammad’s life. According to Sahih Bukhari 4428, one of the most authentic hadith sources in Islam, Muhammad said on his deathbed:

“I feel my aorta is being severed from the poison I ate at Khaybar.”

So ask yourself:
• Why did Muhammad describe his death in exactly the same terms Allah said would happen if he were a false prophet?
• What are the odds that he would mention his aorta — a specific and uncommon term — during his dying moments?
• If Allah’s test was that a liar would die this way, and Muhammad himself said this was happening to him, what does that imply?

This is a serious problem for the claim that Muhammad was speaking for God. The Qur’an set the terms — and Muhammad’s death appears to have fulfilled them.

2. The Satanic Verses Incident

It gets worse. Early Islamic biographies — including Ibn Ishaq, the earliest biography of Muhammad — record that Muhammad once delivered verses saying that pagan gods could intercede. These verses praised the idols of Mecca:

“These are the exalted gharaniq (cranes), whose intercession is hoped for.”

These so-called Satanic Verses were later “withdrawn” by Muhammad, who claimed that Satan had made him speak them by mistake.

This means:
• Muhammad publicly delivered false revelation.
• He admitted it.
• He blamed it on Satan.

This is not a claim made by non-Muslims. This is found in Islamic historical sources — and no serious historian doubts that this tradition existed in early Islam. Whether or not it’s accepted by modern Muslims doesn’t change the implications.

If Muhammad:
• Delivered fake verses and later retracted them,
• And died saying the very thing Allah said would happen to a liar,

Then it’s not unreasonable to conclude that Muhammad failed the very test his own scripture laid out.

⸻

Conclusion:

When you put these two together — the aorta prophecy and the Satanic Verses — you’re not looking at a prophet protected from error. You’re looking at a man whose life and words show strong signs of fabrication, contradiction, and failure of divine protection.

Islam cannot stand up to this level of scrutiny. The cracks show not from outside attacks — but from within its own texts.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DKnfy9UTux3/?igsh=MTRjMnAzdG1la20wdw==

Blessed Pentecost everyone!!

St Basil himself says that the creed of Constantinople 381 added to the nicene creed and even was open to additions about the incarnation.

Well well well, I guess the consensus of fathers support the addition of the Filioque after all

Firstly , Constantinople 1 Wouldn't be an Ecumenical council unless a Pope Validated and RATIFIED IT as a Council .It would have been a Mere Synod without Papal ratification

So what gave the Orthodox easterners the right to Add the the Latter half of the Creed to the existing Nicene Creed.
(Because the Creed we recite today is the Nicene-Constantinopolitan creed) .

If an Orthodox considers adding one word to the Creed to be "another creed," then wouldn't removing large chunks of the original Nicene Creed also qualify as "another creed"? If an Orthodox were to retort, "But the filioque clause is heretical, so it corrupts the Creed," then the Orthodox condemn themselves for being in communion with the Western Church, which taught the filioque. As Orthodox author Edward Siecienski notes, "by the late sixth century the filioque achieved a level of acceptance in the West bordering on unanimity,.

The Numerous Church fathers accepted the Filioque as well... the Orthodox have No reason to Reject it

Oopsies, did St Jerome just say to the Pope he can order a new creed above and better than the nicene creed for everyone to submit to 🙀🙀🙀

EXPLANATION:

Papal Supremacy. The Power of a Pope is Higher than an ecumenical council.

Its true that At Ephesus they decided the Prohibition of Making of new Creeds .

But since the Supremacy of the Pope is Higher than the COUNCILS..... it is Possible since the Pope is Higher than the Council.... and the Council can NEVER be Higher than the Pope

St Cyril the Head Presider of Ephesus clarifies and tells us what it means. He says that Explanations of the creed which are added are not innovative additions but necessary additions for the sake of clarity

The Post above was made to Debunk Orthodox claims attacking the Papacy😊☝️. (This above article shows that Rome did not make any mistake with the Filioque , rather it always teaches and defends the truth , and yeah the filioque is true 💯 )